California Supreme Court· 7/1/1876
People v. Murphy
Citations
- 51 Cal. 376
- 1876 Cal. LEXIS 56
Syllabus
<p>Embezzlement.—If a person, in one connty, is intrusted by„another with personal property, to be returned to the owner, and afterwards takes it to another county, and there embezzles it, he cannot be tried for the crime in the connty where he received it, unless he had conceived the intent of committing the crime when he received it.</p>
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-11-09· cited 29×
- State v. HoshorWashington Supreme Court· 1901-12-17· cited 16×
- State v. HengenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1898-12-16· cited 15×
- People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-05-26· cited 9×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-11-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.