People v. Murawski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court should have permitted voir dire inquiry on the subject of abortion since abortion is \a particularly fertile field for preconceived notions and prejudices\
• trial court should have permitted voir dire inquiry on the subject of abortion since abortion is “a particularly fertile field for preconceived notions and prejudices”
• trial court should have permitted voir dire inquiry on the subject of abortion since abortion is “a particularly fertile field for preconceived notions and prejudices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Strain
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-11-16· cited 134×
• People v. Washington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-05· cited 44×
• People v. Sanders
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 39×
• People v. Ehlert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-08-25· cited 27×
• In re Commitment of Butler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-09-20· cited 27×
• Cordero v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-31· cited 25×
• The PEOPLE v. Carpenter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-03-20· cited 24×
• People v. Mapp
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-23· cited 23×
• People v. Campos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-28· cited 23×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Tilley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1950-09-21· cited 45×
• Simons v. People
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1894-04-02· cited 19×
• Scott v. People
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1872-06-15· cited 5×

Other cases named People v. Murawski

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Murawski
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-11-13