People v. Muhammad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a similar context involving cocaine, that “a challenge to the chain of custody may not be brought as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence,” and that such a challenge may therefore be waived
• “state appellate courts are bound by the state supreme court and have no authority to overrule the supreme court or to modify its decisions” (citing Angelini v. Snow, 58 Ill. App. 3d 116, 119 (1978))
• \state appellate courts are bound by the state supreme court and have no authority to overrule the supreme court or to modify its decisions\ (citing Angelini v. Snow, 58 Ill.App.3d 116, 119, 15 Ill.Dec. 780, 374 N.E.2d 215 (1978))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gatreaux v. DKW ENTERPRISES, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-22· cited 56×
• People v. Wiggen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-06-11· cited 10×
• People v. Petty
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-07-09· cited 9×
• People v. Deroo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-07· cited 6×
• Thompson v. BUNCIK
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-29· cited 5×
• American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tyler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-02-09· cited 5×
• State v. Hampton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-01· cited 1×
• Gartreaux v. DKW Enterprise
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Woods
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 400×
• Angelini v. Snow
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-27· cited 32×