People v. Muckle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he mere possibility that the jury may have relied on identical evidence in returning more than one conviction is not sufficient to trigger the mandatory concurrent sentencing provision.”
• the defendant’s convictions for manslaughter and first degree assault were sufficiently separate when the defendant’s first shot hit the victim in the abdomen and the second shot hit the back of the victims’ arm while he was moving away
• “Traditionally, the trial court has broad discretion at sentencing. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).