Skip to main content

People v. M.S.

Citations

  • 174 Cal. App. 4th 1241
  • 95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 273
  • 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he ADA does not directly apply to juvenile dependency proceedings and cannot be used as a defense in them . . . . [A]ny challenge a parent has under the ADA for alleged violations must be raised in a separate cause of action in federal court.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Margulies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.