People v. Moss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is not necessary for the People to allege or prove that the defendant had had any prior connection with the thief, or that the goods received had been stolen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Edwin Flores
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-28· cited 65×
• People v. Peppars
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-02-09· cited 29×
• People v. Meyer
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-20· cited 27×
• People v. Osborne
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-02-08· cited 21×
• United States v. Brooklier
  C.D. California· 1978-06-13· cited 20×
• State v. Davidson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-08-02· cited 19×
• Darr v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-08-15· cited 13×
• Shadle v. City of Corona
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-08-21· cited 13×
• People v. Wright
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-04-30· cited 7×
• People v. Cramblit
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-09-30· cited 2×
• Amended August 30, 2017 State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee Russell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-06-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Rojas
  California Supreme Court· 1961-01-27· cited 115×
• People v. Meyers
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-03-01· cited 24×
• People v. Parker
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-06-20· cited 17×
• Young v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-08-24· cited 13×
• Lupo v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1973-10-16· cited 11×