People v. Morley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand was unnecessary when warrant procurement procedures were initiated well before illegal entry, which occurred only five minutes before warranted search, and there was no evidence subverting a conclusion of independence
• applying independent source doctrine where “the affidavit supporting the warrant relied only on facts obtained during the undercover operation”
• discerning an independent motive where officers sought a warrant before unlawful discovery of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• v. Dominguez-Castor
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-01-02· cited 1,418×
• v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-22· cited 276×
• People v. George
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2017-06-01· cited 83×
• People v. Cruse
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-01· cited 10×
• People v. Arapu
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2012-06-04· cited 10×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Asha Adolphus THOMPSON
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-22· cited 10×
• People v. Dixon
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-12-21· cited 6×
• v. Delage — Searches and Seizures —Consent —Voluntariness
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2018-05-29· cited 3×
• People v. Haack
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2019-06-17· cited 3×
• v. Gutierrez and People v. Carrillo-Toledo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-22· cited 2×
• People v. Benson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-04-21· cited 2×