People v. Molina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a franchise tax that similarly provided positive incentives for increased in-state activity facially discriminated against interstate commerce
• holding that a nonprofit summer camp was engaged in commerce for purposes of the dormant Commerce Clause
• holding that a nonprofit summer camp was engaged in commerce for purposes of the dormant Commerce Clause
• holding that the dormant Commerce Clause applies to the not-for-profit sector of the economy
• holding that the dormant Commerce Clause applies to the not-for-profit sector of the economy
• holding that a Maine property tax exemption that favored camps that served mostly local residents and penalized camps that had almost all out-of-state campers facially discriminated against interstate commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).