Skip to main content

Citations

  • 39 A.D.3d 567
  • 835 N.Y.S.2d 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “defendant’s claim that he was deprived of due process by the interpreter’s alleged failure to file an oath of public office is based on matter dehors the record and cannot be reviewed on direct appeal”
  • finding that the “defendant’s claim that he was deprived of due process by the interpreter’s alleged failure to file an oath of public office is based on matter dehors the record and cannot be reviewed on direct appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.