People v. Mocaby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence was insufficient to show that pills were controlled substances where a forensic scientist had identified the pills by comparing them to pictures in a book but had not performed a chemical analysis
• holding evidence insufficient to show that pills were controlled substances where forensic scientist had identified the pills by comparing them to pictures in a book but had not performed chemical analysis
• if “ ‘the evidence is so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory as to justify a reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt,’ ” the conviction must be reversed (quoting Smith, 185 Ill. 2d at 542)
• if “ ‘the evidence is so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory as to justify a reasonable doubt of defendant’s guilt,’ ” the conviction must be reversed (quoting Smith, 185 Ill. 2d at 542)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Mocaby

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Mocaby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-09· cited 11×
• People v. Mocaby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-01-31