People v. Mobley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the appellate court reviewed alleged error regarding possible misapplication of the law during sentencing under the second prong of the plain error doctrine because the alleged error involved a substantial right
• the appellate court reviewed alleged error regarding possible misapplication of the law during sentencing under the second prong of the plain error doctrine because the alleged error involved a substantial right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Shaw
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-11-26· cited 22×
• People v. Foreman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-08-07· cited 19×
• People v. Rennie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-06-26· cited 9×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Blair
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-06-03· cited 468×
• People v. Reed
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 354×
• People v. Bradley
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-04-18· cited 197×
• Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1955-05-20· cited 160×
• People v. Bales
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 137×
• People v. Hudson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 126×
• Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLP
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 67×
• People v. Kimbrough
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-11-23· cited 63×
• People v. Savage
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-10-31· cited 30×
• Schultz v. Lakewood Electric Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-11-21· cited 21×
• People v. Carter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-10-12· cited 16×
• People v. McCormick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-07-17· cited 13×
• People v. Dean
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-02-16· cited 5×