People v. Mitchell
Citations
- 35 A.D.3d 507
- 826 N.Y.S.2d 144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since no objection was raised to the admissibility of the tape at trial, the defendant’s contention is unpreserved for appellate review.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chrysler v. GuineyS.D. New York· 2014-03-31· cited 21×
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-10-16· cited 9×
- People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-01-27· cited 8×
- People v. OsbourneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-01-12· cited 4×
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-02-09· cited 2×
- People v. McDayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-08
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-11-22· cited 10,344×
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-10-29· cited 6,191×
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals· 1998-06-11· cited 4,938×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals· 1988-05-31· cited 2,065×
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-25· cited 83×
- People v. BonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-04-25· cited 30×
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-03-22· cited 27×
- Marino v. New YorkSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 15×
- People v. CatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-10-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.