People v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the State “is ordinarily not required to make proof of the reasonableness of [a] seizure *** unless that question is raised by a defense motion to suppress” and finding it not “proper to pass upon the validity of the search” given the undeveloped record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Calderon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-10-23· cited 22×
• People v. Fernandez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-10-13· cited 19×
• People v. Gray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-05-05· cited 15×
• People v. Ruple
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-04-04· cited 14×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-06-25· cited 14×
• People v. Vasser
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-05-21· cited 10×
• People v. Henry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-26· cited 7×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The People v. Beier
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-11-26· cited 109×
• The People v. Rothe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1934-10-24· cited 88×
• People v. Martin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-02-16· cited 26×
• The People v. Cepek
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1934-10-17· cited 26×
• People v. Harter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-04-11· cited 15×
• People v. Willis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-23· cited 5×