People v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that restitution statute does not bar a separate civil action by the victim
• finding that restitution statute does not bar a separate civil action by the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Culbreath
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-29· cited 20×
• Indesco Products, Inc. v. Novak
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-08· cited 11×
• Spircoff v. Stranski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-11-02· cited 8×
• People v. Morrison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-13· cited 6×
• People v. Visor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-23· cited 2×
• People v. Bruun
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-04-13· cited 1×
• Erickson v. Mitrione
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-12-02· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
• People v. Harris
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 172×
• People v. Manzo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-05-10· cited 12×
• People v. Wagner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-10-19· cited 12×
• People v. Nasser
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-30· cited 7×