People v. Miniear

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Moreover, since prior consistent statements are admissible for the sole purpose of rehabilitation and are not admitted in proof of the truthfulness of statements made on direct examination, there is no violation of the hearsay rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).