Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/20/1990

People v. Mims

Citations

561 N.E.2d 1101
204 Ill. App. 3d 87
149 Ill. Dec. 405
1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 1432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to address the merits of the argument where defendant did not testify and the no-ruling issue is \academic\
declining to address the merits of the argument where defendant did not testify and the no-ruling issue is “academic”
declining to address the merits of the argument where defendant did not testify and the no-ruling issue is “academic”
Defendant's failure to testify makes the no-ruling issue \academic\
where trial court reserved ruling as to whether State could use prior misdemeanor offenses against the defendant upon his cross-examination at trial, and where he did not even testify, issue raised regarding this was held to be merely academic and not ripe for review
where trial court reserved ruling as to whether State could use prior misdemeanor offenses against the defendant upon his cross-examination at trial, and where he did not even testify, issue raised regarding this was held to be merely academic and not ripe for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.