People v. Milestone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officers' failure to inform the defendant in custody that his attorney was on the telephone seeking to consult with him rendered the defendant's subsequent statements not admissible
• holding that police officers’ failure to inform the defendant in custody that his attorney was on the telephone seeking to consult with him rendered the defendant’s subsequent statements not admissible
• holding (that police officers’ failure to inform the defendant in custody that his attorney was on the telephone seeking to consult with him rendered the defendant’s subsequent statements not admissible), with People v. Albrecht, 271 Ill. App. 3d 629, 630-32, 637, 639 (1995

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).