People v. Michael D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where the section of the Code is mandatory and dispositive, there is no requirement of prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Cynthia S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-30· cited 28×
• People v. Lance H.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-18· cited 16×
• People v. Gloria C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-02-17· cited 12×
• In re Cynthia S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-30
• In Gloria C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-02-17

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilson v. Clark
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-03-27· cited 460×
• People v. Barbara H.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 271×
• Cripe v. Leiter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 72×
• Piano v. Davison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-24· cited 71×
• People v. Long
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-19· cited 26×
• Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-09-11· cited 25×
• The PEOPLE v. Chennault
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-03-23· cited 25×
• People v. Jefferson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-05· cited 23×
• Matter of Adams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-01-28· cited 11×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-30· cited 9×
• In Re Marriage of Burgess
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-22· cited 9×
• In Re Yates
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-02· cited 8×
• Matter of Wiessing
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-06-04· cited 7×