People v. Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Counterman to evaluate an inventory search but -not citing either the State or Federal Constitution
• relying on Counterman to evaluate an inventory search but not citing either the State or Federal Constitution
• evidence discovered in a trunk during an inventory search admissible against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-04-03· cited 111×
• State v. Prober
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-09-30· cited 78×
• State v. Roth
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-05-13· cited 39×
• State v. Flittie
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 23×
• People v. Bertine
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-09-30· cited 14×
• People v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-02-26· cited 8×
• People v. Parks
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-11-05· cited 6×
• Imaging Services, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-12-21· cited 3×
• People v. Eakins
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1978-12-11· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cady v. Dombrowski
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
• Mozzetti v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1971-04-30· cited 229×
• People v. Counterman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-11-22· cited 46×
• People v. Lorio
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-03-15· cited 31×
• People v. Trusty
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-12-03· cited 27×
• People v. Rutovic
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-07-25· cited 11×
• People v. Tangas
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-02-09· cited 7×