People v. Medina-Feliz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an officer’s “use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer’s request might be compelled” may be indicative of a seizure
• explaining “that our analysis of constitutional questions under the Fourth Amendment is [not] constricted” and that our review of the trial court’s conclusions of law is de novo
• explaining “that our analysis of constitutional questions under the Fourth Amendment is [not] constricted” and that our review of the trial court’s conclusions of law is de novo
• Hooks, with a lawn chair behind him, and metal fencing to either side, was surrounded by four officers occupying the path in front of him and who commanded that he “get up”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).