People v. McInnis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s contention that different and reasonable inference may be drawn from the same evidence did not make inference which the State chose to argue improper or impossible
• concluding that defendant's contention that different and reasonable inference may be drawn from the same evidence did not make inference which the State chose to argue improper or impossible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).