Skip to main content

People v. McFadden

Citations

  • 407 N.W.2d 78
  • 159 Mich. App. 796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because defense counsel subjected the witness to a “rigorous cross-examination” and attempted to impeach the witness’s credibility, “counsel’s performance was equal to that of a lawyer with ordinary training and skill and [] he conscientiously protected his client’s interests”
  • holding that, because defense counsel subjected the witness to a “rigorous cross-examination” and attempted to impeach the witness’s credibility, “counsel’s performance was equal to that of a lawyer with ordinary training and skill and [] he conscientiously protected his client’s interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holbrook, Sullivan, Warshawsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.