People v. McDuffie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fifty- to sixty-percent chance of \improving\ did not meet the substantially likely standard
• holding that testimony of a fifty to sixty percent chance defendant would be rendered competent was not enough under Sell
• concluding that a fifty to sixty percent likelihood was insufficient under Sell
• concluding that a fifty to sixty percent likelihood was insufficient under Sell
• reversing a court’s Sell order in part because fifty to sixty percent likelihood of being restored to competency was determined insufficient under Sell
• reversing a court’s Sell order in part because fifty to sixty percent likelihood of being restored to competency was determined insufficient under Sell

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Christiana
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-12-10· cited 25×
• State v. Barzee
  Utah Supreme Court· 2007-12-14· cited 11×
• State v. Cantrell
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-03-05· cited 8×
• R. A. v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2024-05-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington v. Harper
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 1,489×
• Sell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1,055×
• In Re Qawi
  California Supreme Court· 2004-01-05· cited 233×
• Riese v. St. Mary's Hospital & Medical Center
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-16· cited 95×
• People v. O'DELL
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-02-03· cited 22×
• United States v. Rivera-Morales
  S.D. California· 2005-04-06· cited 14×