Skip to main content
· 9/4/2008

People v. McCulloch

Citations

  • 198 P.3d 1264
  • 2008 WL 4138473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that by agreeing to a stipulated sentence a defendant doesn’t waive his right to challenge the proportionality of that sentence
  • finding an attempt to lure a seventeen-year-old boy into a consensual sexual encounter to be grave or serious
  • a challenge to the intrinsic fairness of a sentence includes whether the particular sentence was a wise exercise of discretion
  • “The circumstances of this particular 9 offense, however, coupled with defendant’s criminal background, were aggravated.”
  • “[A]ppellate scrutiny of an Eighth Amendment challenge is de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connelly, Rothenberg, Roman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.