· 9/4/2008
People v. McCulloch
Citations
- 198 P.3d 1264
- 2008 WL 4138473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that by agreeing to a stipulated sentence a defendant doesn’t waive his right to challenge the proportionality of that sentence
- finding an attempt to lure a seventeen-year-old boy into a consensual sexual encounter to be grave or serious
- a challenge to the intrinsic fairness of a sentence includes whether the particular sentence was a wise exercise of discretion
- “The circumstances of this particular 9 offense, however, coupled with defendant’s criminal background, were aggravated.”
- “[A]ppellate scrutiny of an Eighth Amendment challenge is de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connelly, Rothenberg, Roman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.