Skip to main content

People v. McCray

Citations

  • 653 N.E.2d 25
  • 210 Ill. Dec. 438
  • 273 Ill. App. 3d 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court may directly order the clerk to correct the mittimus
  • “ [r]emandment is unnecessary since this court has the authority to directly order the clerk of the circuit court to make the necessary corrections
  • “[rjemandment is unnecessary since this court has the authority to directly order the clerk of the circuit court to make the necessary corrections”
  • remand was unnecessary because “this court has the authority to directly order the clerk of the circuit court to make the necessary corrections”
  • “[r]emandment is unnecessary since this court has the authority to directly order the clerk of the circuit court to make the necessary corrections
  • “[r]emandment is unnecessary since this court has the authority to directly order the clerk of the circuit court to make the necessary corrections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.