People v. McCracken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant's failure to appear because he was incarcerated in Indiana did not justify the release of the surety because the surety was required to ensure the defendant's presence within this state's jurisdiction
• the defendant’s failure to appear because he was incarcerated in Indiana did not justify the release of the surety because the surety was required to ensure the defendant’s presence within this state’s jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pueblo v. Rivera Segarra
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1995-10-19· cited 9×
• In Re Surety Bond
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 7×
• People v. Kang
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-04-03· cited 6×
• State v. Mottolese
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-06-12· cited 6×
• People v. Glumb
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-07-25· cited 4×
• People v. Meadows
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Robb
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1894-01-09· cited 8×
• State v. Mitchell
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1965-09-01· cited 7×