Illinois Supreme Court· 9/30/1981
People v. McCarty
Citations
- 427 N.E.2d 147
- 86 Ill. 2d 247
- 56 Ill. Dec. 67
- 1981 Ill. LEXIS 340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the legislature had a rational basis for statutorily classifying cocaine as a \narcotic\ drug, based, in part, on a review of scientific literature
- concluding that the legislature had a rational basis for statutorily classifying cocaine as a \narcotic\ drug, based, in part, on a review of scientific literature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 332×
- People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-08-02· cited 243×
- Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 152×
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. SchreierIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-10-22· cited 67×
- People v. MehlbergAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-03· cited 58×
- People v. BurmeisterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-26· cited 41×
- United States v. EttlesonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-07-26· cited 32×
- People v. MunozAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-02-26· cited 26×
- People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-21· cited 23×
- People v. KaiglerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-05-21· cited 23×
- Yellow Cab Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 22×
- People v. ChianakasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-04-25· cited 21×
- People v. StoutMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 20×
- People v. DunlapAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-22· cited 18×
- People v. HarmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-03-10· cited 17×
- People v. BrownsteinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-31· cited 16×
- People v. McCartyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-18· cited 14×
- People v. TaorminaMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-10-25· cited 14×
- In Re ParkerIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-06-09· cited 14×
- People v. KeyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-11-04· cited 12×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BonannoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-05-19· cited 1,730×
- The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-10-15· cited 201×
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-01-20· cited 169×
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonNinth Circuit· 1977-08-12· cited 164×
- Winters v. BohanonSupreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 150×
- United States v. Eugene L. SmaldoneTenth Circuit· 1973-08-31· cited 83×
- United States v. Stewart FossFirst Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 71×
- United States v. Odell MarshallNinth Circuit· 1976-03-24· cited 69×
- Thillens, Inc. v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court· 1957-05-23· cited 55×
- United States v. Clark J. UmentumSeventh Circuit· 1976-11-24· cited 51×
- United States v. Jaime Vila, Narcisco Guzman, and Luis HernandezSecond Circuit· 1979-05-01· cited 43×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-04-24· cited 40×
- Government of the Canal Zone v. Brian Kent Davis and Wolfgang Ludwig Otto GossowFifth Circuit· 1979-04-06· cited 30×
- United States v. BrookinsD. New Jersey· 1974-10-29· cited 29×
- United States v. Ronald Lee HarperNinth Circuit· 1976-03-25· cited 28×
- People v. McCartyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-02· cited 25×
- United States v. Fred Arthur Lane, III and William Kent JonesTenth Circuit· 1978-05-30· cited 24×
- United States v. UmentumE.D. Wisconsin· 1975-09-19· cited 22×
- United States v. Frederick R. WheatonFirst Circuit· 1977-06-30· cited 16×
- United States v. Steven Ira SolowFifth Circuit· 1978-06-14· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.