Colorado Court of Appeals· 9/22/2005
People v. McCann
Citations
- 122 P.3d 1085
- 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 1511
- 2005 WL 2323243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court may conclude on remand that, upon the pre-appeal deadline for the People’s restitution motion, there was no evidence from which the court could conclude that the victim had suffered a pecuniary loss
- where the district court advised the defendant that the restitution order would become final upon expiration of the time period for objections, the court could amend the order before the deadline
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taubman, Carparelli, Piccone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- The People of the State of Colorado v. Benjamin WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-11-08· cited 3,837×
- People v. EverettColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-02-04· cited 843×
- People v. BowermanColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-09-02· cited 191×
- Peo v. StoneColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-02-13· cited 176×
- People v. McLainColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-05-19· cited 163×
- v. WeeksColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-03-19· cited 104×
- v. RiceColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-10-08· cited 6×
- People v. ReyesColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-06-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.