Skip to main content

People v. McCann

Citations

  • 122 P.3d 1085
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 1511
  • 2005 WL 2323243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the trial court may conclude on remand that, upon the pre-appeal deadline for the People’s restitution motion, there was no evidence from which the court could conclude that the victim had suffered a pecuniary loss
  • where the district court advised the defendant that the restitution order would become final upon expiration of the time period for objections, the court could amend the order before the deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Carparelli, Piccone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.