People v. McAnally

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 19-2-511(1) requires protective counseling “from one whose interests are not adverse to those of the juvenile”
• holding that section 19-2-511(1) requires protective counseling \from one whose interests are not adverse to those of the juvenile\
• counselor employed by department of institutions, to which the child had earlier been committed, does not satisfy the requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Saiz
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-11-17· cited 43×
• People v. Maes
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-11-15· cited 33×
• Nicholas v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-01-11· cited 27×
• People v. L. A. Jr.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-03-31· cited 12×
• People v. Legler
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-11-30· cited 10×
• People v. S.M.D.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-10· cited 8×
• People in Interest of JFC
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1982-09-09· cited 6×
• People v. Cunningham
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1983-11-10· cited 4×
• People in Interest of MM
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-07-26· cited 2×
• People in the Interest of A.L.-C
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-10-24· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• People in Interest of LB
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1973-08-17· cited 28×