People v. McAloney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a schizophrenia diagnosis “do[es] not necessarily imply that [petitioner] did not understand the proceeding or could not cooperate with his 3 16-10397 counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).