People v. Maxineau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that having a magistrate judge presiding over closing arguments in a criminal case, without the parties’ consent, was harmless error because his rulings and responses to objections during the arguments “could not have misled the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).