Skip to main content
· 2/2/1966

People v. Matos Pretto

Citations

  • 93 P.R. 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • violación del Canon 18 del Código de Ética Profesional, 4 L.P.R.A. Ap. IX; representó de forma negligente a sus clientes en un asunto que le fue encomendado
  • Violación del Canon 18 de los de Ética Profesional, 4 L.P.R.A. Ap. IX

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.