Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/6/2005

People v. Mathis

Citations

827 N.E.2d 932
357 Ill. App. 3d 45
293 Ill. Dec. 51
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

construing section 5 — 130(2)(c)(ii), which contains language that is virtually identical to the provision at issue here
because the defendant -5- No. 2--07--0926 was unable to seek relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act--since he was not imprisoned and was not asserting a substantial denial of his constitutional rights--he could properly raise his claim under section 2--1401 of the Civil Code
because the defendant was unable to seek relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act — since he was not imprisoned and was not asserting a substantial denial of his constitutional rights — he could properly raise his claim under section 2 — 1401 of the Civil Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.