Skip to main content

Citations

  • 52 A.D.3d 68
  • 855 N.Y.S.2d 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that absent a constitutional or statutory prohibition, a “DNA indictment is an appropriate method to prosecute perpetrators of some of the most heinous criminal acts.”
  • especially in light of prevalence of DNA data banks as criminal justice tools, “DNA indictment is an appropriate method to prosecute perpetrators of some of the most heinous criminal acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acosta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.