Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/3/2007

People v. Marshall

Citations

873 N.E.2d 978
375 Ill. App. 3d 670
314 Ill. Dec. 48
2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that third-stage counsel was not required to file a Rule 651(c) certificate where second-stage counsel had already met the rule's requirements
noting earlier decision to remand for substantive evidentiary hearing on the defendant’s claim that her trial attorney was ineffective
noting earlier decision to remand for substantive evidentiary hearing on the defendant’s claim that her trial attorney was ineffective
a presumption of compliance “can be rebutted by the record” (citing People v. Lander, 215 Ill. 2d 577, 584 (2005))
“Third-stage counsel does not, as Rule 651(c) requires, examine the record or amend the petition further.”
“A filed Rule 651(c) certificate creates a presumption of compliance that can be rebutted by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.