People v. MAPPS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any error in admitting the evidence was harmless because it was cumulativ e of other evidence
• \The lapse of time between commission of an offense and the execution of a warrant ... is not determinative of the staleness of information.\
• error is harmless where it does not \substantially influence the verdict or impair the fairness of ... [the] trial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).