People v. Manser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that our Supreme Court has held that expert testimony can be relevant and helpful to explain a specific behavior that might otherwise be misconstrued by the jury
• overruled in part, People v. Miller , 482 Mich. 540 , 759 N.W.2d 850 , 863 & n.26 (2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).