Michigan Court of Appeals· 2/25/1972
People v. Manning
Citations
- 197 N.W.2d 152
- 38 Mich. App. 662
- 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that possession requires the defendant to have been given dominion over the property, not simply custody
- noting that possession requires -3- the defendant to have been given dominion over the property, not simply custody
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Danhof, Burns, Van Valkenburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.