People v. Manhattan Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the words “[a]pproved by” followed by obligor’s signature did not satisfy the Act
• finding that the words “[a]pproved by” followed by obligor’s signature did not satisfy the UWOA
• agreement to make children sole beneficiaries of life insurance policy, entered into without lawful consideration, could not be enforced in equity against named beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).