People v. Mangiaracina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hether the defendant intended to commit the offenses without the victim’s consent is not relevant; the critical question being whether the victim did, in fact, consent. This involves her mental state, not the defendant’s.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Rico Williams
  D.C. Circuit· 2016-09-02· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Minor
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2004-01-16· cited 50×
• People v. Witte
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-05-20· cited 29×
• People v. A.M.C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-03· cited 18×
• In Re AMC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-03· cited 10×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. McDonald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 321×
• People v. Romero
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-04-05· cited 135×
• The PEOPLE v. Ballinger
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 55×
• People v. Utinans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-11-16· cited 27×
• People v. Seel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-01-16· cited 22×