People v. Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although “what shall constitute a disturbance cannot easily be brought within a definition applicable to all cases[,] ... there is commonly no great difficulty in ascertaining what is a willful disturbance in a given case” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Kay
  California Supreme Court· 1970-01-30· cited 130×
• State v. McNair
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1965-05-28· cited 45×
• State v. Orzen
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-01-14· cited 27×
• People v. Morrisey
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1994-03-15· cited 6×
• State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-01-25· cited 4×
• People v. King
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1990-10-17· cited 3×
• City of Champaign v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-08-01· cited 1×
• In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Weed
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-05-21
• People v. Albra
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-09-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hartshorn v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1857-06-15· cited 14×