People v. MAGLAYA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when “shoeprints are so large and the points of similarity so obvious, the comparison is a matter of nonexpert rather than of expert testimony.” (emphasis, alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)
• stating that when “shoeprints are so large and the points of similarity so obvious, the comparison is a matter of nonexpert rather than of expert testimony.” (emphasis, altération, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)
• stating that 19 when “shoeprints are so large and the points of similarity so obvious, the comparison 6 1 is a matter of nonexpert rather than of expert testimony.” (emphasis, alteration, 2 internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).