People v. MacOn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to prevent risk of exposure to double -8- jeopardy after reversal for error, court will consider whether the State presented sufficient evidence to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• to prevent risk of exposure to double jeopardy after reversal for error, court will consider whether the State presented sufficient evidence to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
• “where a conviction - 22 - 2020 IL App (2d
• “where a conviction has been set aside because of an error in the proceedings leading to the conviction,” the State may retry the defendant; thus, the appellate court must review the sufficiency of the evidence to “prevent the risk of exposing [the] defendant to double jeopardy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).