People v. Machlovitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• con- structive possession where defendant referred to “his forty” and purchased .40 caliber ammunition, even though gun was found in his girlfriend’s car and did not have his DNA or fin- gerprints on it
• con- structive possession where defendant referred to “his forty” and purchased .40 caliber ammunition, even though gun was found in his girlfriend’s car and did not have his DNA or fin- gerprints on it
• con- structive possession where defendant referred to “his forty” and purchased .40 caliber ammunition, even though gun was found in his girlfriend’s car and did not have his DNA or fin- gerprints on it
• con- structive possession where defendant referred to “his forty” and purchased .40 caliber ammunition, even though gun was found in his girlfriend’s car and did not have his DNA or fin- gerprints on it
• con- structive possession where defendant referred to “his forty” and purchased .40 caliber ammunition, even though gun was found in his girlfriend’s car and did not have his DNA or fin- gerprints on it
• uphold- ing warrantless search of parolee even where parole agree- ment required “reasonable cause to believe that the parolee is violating or is in imminent danger of violating a condition to remaining on parole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).