People v. Lykes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• continuous treatment doctrine did not apply when neither plaintiff nor defendant anticipated successive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, treating physician independently analyzed MRI scans and defendant made no decisions as to plaintiffs treatment
• “although at least one radiologist at [practice group] reviewed prior MRIs when generating his MRI report, such conduct, standing alone, does not alter the fact that each MRI scan and [radiology] report was a complete and discrete service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).