Colorado Court of Appeals· 8/5/1999
People v. Luman
Citations
- 994 P.2d 432
- 1999 WL 215970
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that challenge for cause should have been granted where juror made equivocal statements about her ability to be fair and then was inadequately rehabilitated
- holding that application of statute to date range beginning before its enactment violated prohibition on ex post facto laws
- reversing convictions because “there was no rehabilitation . . . containing unequivocal statements by the juror of [their] commitment to fairness that might support the trial court’s conclusion”
- reversing conviction and finding that if state presents similar evidence on retrial of defendant, jury could conclude that defendant was in position of trust relative to child victim within the meaning of applicable statute
- “In addition, taking the voir dire as a whole, we conclude there is no support in the record for a finding or conclusion that this juror could be fair and impartial or that she ever expressly or impliedly said she could.”
- setting forth abuse of discretion standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roy, Jones, Marquez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. SamsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-10-11· cited 705×
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-12-16· cited 410×
- People v. GholstonColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-05-11· cited 194×
- People v. KyleColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-07-29· cited 44×
- People v. MerrowColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 22×
- People v. SimonColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-05-13· cited 22×
- People v. DuncanColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-03-01· cited 17×
- People v. RoggowSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-12-09· cited 17×
- People v. ArkoColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-10-05· cited 14×
- Klahn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-08-13· cited 14×
- People v. MarshColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-12-22· cited 14×
- People v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-10-31· cited 13×
- People v. HancockColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-10-15· cited 11×
- People v. EllisColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-03-23· cited 9×
- People v. DaltonColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-11-07· cited 9×
- v. BlassingameColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-02-11· cited 8×
- SER Carl L. Harris, Prosecuting Attorney v. Hon. John W. Hatcher, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-05-29· cited 7×
- People v. NagiColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-02-13· cited 7×
- People v. ChavezColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-07-21· cited 5×
- People v. FleischackerColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-01-17· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- People v. AbbottSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-11-13· cited 362×
- Carrillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-02-22· cited 305×
- Morgan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-03-09· cited 261×
- People v. GrahamColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-01-13· cited 183×
- People v. FullerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-09· cited 152×
- Thomas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-10-09· cited 100×
- People v. McCrarySupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-05-17· cited 90×
- People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-23· cited 87×
- People v. RussoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-02-10· cited 80×
- People v. SandovalSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-17· cited 66×
- People v. LongoriaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-11-15· cited 50×
- People v. NedColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-01-25· cited 33×
- People v. MaesColorado Court of Appeals· 1980-01-10· cited 25×
- People v. BowringColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-03-23· cited 25×
- People v. SchmidtColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-07-14· cited 18×
- People v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-12-21· cited 15×
- People v. GrenemyerColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-02-13· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.