People v. Lujan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that disbarment was the presumptive sanction for a lawyer's theft from her law firm but electing to instead suspend the lawyer fot‘three years 'in light of overwhelming mitigating evidence
• suspending rather than disbarring a lawyer who knowingly converted client funds, where \extraordinary and tragic factors\ applied in mitigation, including the emergence of a mental disorder that caused the misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lavenhar
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-03-31· cited 20×
• People v. Guyerson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-06-30· cited 17×
• People v. Katz
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-11-22· cited 11×
• People v. Shidler
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-08-28· cited 8×
• People v. Andersen
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2000-07-21· cited 6×
• People v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-04-03· cited 5×
• In Re Corbin
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-02-16· cited 5×
• People v. Apker
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2003-04-07· cited 4×
• People v. McDonnell
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-06-19· cited 3×
• People v. Cohen
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-01-11· cited 3×
• People v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2005-02-07· cited 2×
• People v. Ra'Shadd
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2005-03-10· cited 1×
• People v. Clough
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2003-08-13· cited 1×
• People v. Waters
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2019-01-22· cited 1×
• People v. BARDULIS
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2008-03-13
• People v. D'Acquisto
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2006-08-09
• People v. Cochrane
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2013-01-18
• People v. Kleinsmith
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-11-18