Skip to main content
· 2/2/2010

People v. Lucey

Citations

  • 787 N.W.2d 133
  • 287 Mich. App. 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court does not abuse its discretion when it denies a defendant’s objection to the inclusion of a victim’s subjective impact statement in the presentence investigation report
  • holding that a trial court does not abuse its discretion when it denies a defendant’s objection to the inclusion of a victim’s subjective impact statement in the presentence investigation report
  • noting that the defendant did not bring an effective challenge because he failed to support his challenge
  • “Defendant has not supported his challenge; therefore, we conclude that the challenge was not effective and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to change the [presentence investigation report].”
  • “Defendant has not supported his challenge; therefore, we conclude that the challenge was not effective and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to change the [presentence investigation report].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beckering, Markey, Borrello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.