· 2/2/2010
People v. Lucey
Citations
- 787 N.W.2d 133
- 287 Mich. App. 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court does not abuse its discretion when it denies a defendant’s objection to the inclusion of a victim’s subjective impact statement in the presentence investigation report
- holding that a trial court does not abuse its discretion when it denies a defendant’s objection to the inclusion of a victim’s subjective impact statement in the presentence investigation report
- noting that the defendant did not bring an effective challenge because he failed to support his challenge
- “Defendant has not supported his challenge; therefore, we conclude that the challenge was not effective and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to change the [presentence investigation report].”
- “Defendant has not supported his challenge; therefore, we conclude that the challenge was not effective and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to change the [presentence investigation report].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beckering, Markey, Borrello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.