Illinois Supreme Court· 10/17/2008
People v. Lucas
Citations
- 897 N.E.2d 778
- 231 Ill. 2d 169
- 325 Ill. Dec. 239
- 2008 Ill. LEXIS 1419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the prior convictions that served as the basis for a felony DWLR conviction were sentencing enhancements and not elements of the offense
- determining that the prior offenses are not elements of the offense that the State must prove at trial
- to find a defendant guilty of armed violence the State must prove the predicate felony beyond a reasonable doubt
- “Due process requires that to sustain a conviction of a criminal offense, the State must prove a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the existence of every element of the offense.”
- “Due process requires that to sustain a conviction of a criminal offense, the State must prove a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the existence of every element of the offense.”
- the State may forfeit the issue of forfeiture
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2017-09-21· cited 474×
- Adames v. SheahanIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-03-19· cited 131×
- Carter v. SSC Odin Operating CompanyIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-09-20· cited 111×
- People v. DensonIllinois Supreme Court· 2014-12-29· cited 96×
- People v. HuntIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-06-04· cited 60×
- People v. LigonIllinois Supreme Court· 2016-03-29· cited 53×
- People v.SalamonIllinois Supreme Court· 2022-04-21· cited 42×
- People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-30· cited 41×
- People v. VillaIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 33×
- People v. RamirezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-10-04· cited 32×
- People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-09· cited 28×
- People v. SpanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-30· cited 26×
- People v. HellerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-04-13· cited 24×
- People v. ForemanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2019-08-07· cited 19×
- People v. PalomeraAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-02-16· cited 15×
- People v. QuevedoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-07-16· cited 14×
- People v. McGheeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-03· cited 13×
- People v. HeritschAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-28· cited 11×
- People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court· 2025-01-24· cited 8×
- People v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2018-03-02· cited 7×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- People v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 422×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 413×
- People v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 203×
- People of Illinois v. HaronIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-04· cited 200×
- People v. AlejosIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-04· cited 160×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 153×
- People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-02-07· cited 113×
- Barragan v. Casco Design Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 69×
- People v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court· 1955-11-23· cited 62×
- People v. FernettiIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 55×
- People v. DiPaceAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-10· cited 39×
- People v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-13· cited 34×
- People v. RobyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-08-04· cited 15×
- People v. LucasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-03-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.