People v. Losey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence involved either a collateral matter of material which should have been in the prosecution’s case in chief
• evidence involved either a collateral matter of material which should have been in the prosecution's case in chief
• “[T]he prosecutor may not divide the evidence on which the people propose to rest their case, saving some for rebuttal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).